- A+
由于这近一年时间一直忙于写书和工作,一直没有水文,但是近期有几位朋友使用我们的Magicodes.IE反馈在导出过程中内存暴涨...好吧,不管怎样,不能苦了我们朋友,接下来我们通过windbg来看一下什么原因导致的。
接下来我们先通过address -summary
来看一下当前应用内存占用量。
0:000> !address -summary --- Usage Summary ---------------- RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal Free 581 7df8`ef0c9000 ( 125.972 TB) 98.42% <unknown> 1678 206`ffb9e000 ( 2.027 TB) 99.99% 1.58% Image 950 0`064fd000 ( 100.988 MB) 0.00% 0.00% Heap 58 0`050f6000 ( 80.961 MB) 0.00% 0.00% Stack 156 0`04380000 ( 67.500 MB) 0.00% 0.00% Other 11 0`019ad000 ( 25.676 MB) 0.00% 0.00% TEB 52 0`00068000 ( 416.000 kB) 0.00% 0.00% PEB 1 0`00001000 ( 4.000 kB) 0.00% 0.00% --- Type Summary (for busy) ------ RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal MEM_MAPPED 282 200`038a6000 ( 2.000 TB) 98.64% 1.56% MEM_PRIVATE 1674 7`07184000 ( 28.111 GB) 1.35% 0.02% MEM_IMAGE 950 0`064fd000 ( 100.988 MB) 0.00% 0.00% --- State Summary ---------------- RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal MEM_FREE 581 7df8`ef0c9000 ( 125.972 TB) 98.42% MEM_RESERVE 295 205`f8659000 ( 2.023 TB) 99.79% 1.58% MEM_COMMIT 2611 1`188ce000 ( 4.384 GB) 0.21% 0.00% --- Protect Summary (for commit) - RgnCount ----------- Total Size -------- %ofBusy %ofTotal PAGE_READWRITE 1595 1`0dc6c000 ( 4.215 GB) 0.20% 0.00% PAGE_EXECUTE_READ 156 0`04d66000 ( 77.398 MB) 0.00% 0.00% PAGE_READONLY 600 0`03851000 ( 56.316 MB) 0.00% 0.00% PAGE_NOACCESS 99 0`021f2000 ( 33.945 MB) 0.00% 0.00% PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE 19 0`0027b000 ( 2.480 MB) 0.00% 0.00% PAGE_WRITECOPY 90 0`001a0000 ( 1.625 MB) 0.00% 0.00% PAGE_READWRITE | PAGE_GUARD 52 0`0009e000 ( 632.000 kB) 0.00% 0.00% --- Largest Region by Usage ----------- Base Address -------- Region Size ---------- Free 189`0413c000 7c6b`01ed4000 ( 124.418 TB) <unknown> 7dfb`2a153000 1f9`bd2ef000 ( 1.976 TB) Image 7ffc`883c1000 0`009ba000 ( 9.727 MB) Heap 183`0e9a1000 0`00f01000 ( 15.004 MB) Stack 37`62980000 0`0017b000 ( 1.480 MB) Other 183`77707000 0`01775000 ( 23.457 MB) TEB 37`62600000 0`00002000 ( 8.000 kB) PEB 37`627dd000 0`00001000 ( 4.000 kB)
MEM_COMMIT占用了4.384G,接下来我们利用eeheap -gc
来检查托管堆。
0:000> !eeheap -gc GC Allocated Heap Size: Size: 0x11ac2568 (296494440) bytes. GC Committed Heap Size: Size: 0x120e7000 (302936064) bytes.
根据这些内存来看,似乎问题不是这里,大量的内存还是出现在非托管。我们利用Windows NT堆来看一下,其实在Windows中大多数的用户堆分配器都在ntdll.dll中的NT堆管理器API(RtlAllocateHeap/RtlFreeHeap)上建立,比如说C中的malloc/free和new/delete,另外还有COM框架中的SysAllocString以及在Win32中的LocalAlloc、GlobalAlloc和HeapAlloc,虽然说这些分配器都会创建不同的堆来存储它们的内存,但是他们最终都要调用ntdll.dll中的NT堆来实现。
0:000> !heap -s ************************************************************************************************************************ NT HEAP STATS BELOW ************************************************************************************************************************ NtGlobalFlag enables following debugging aids for new heaps: stack back traces LFH Key : 0x7cfd4cc2db4ddb4d Termination on corruption : ENABLED Heap Flags Reserv Commit Virt Free List UCR Virt Lock Fast (k) (k) (k) (k) length blocks cont. heap ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0000018378fd0000 08000002 65128 15296 64928 1720 177 17 2 c LFH External fragmentation 11 % (177 free blocks) 00000183775c0000 08008000 64 4 64 2 1 1 0 0 000001837aa90000 08001002 1280 108 1080 26 3 2 0 0 LFH 000001837ad20000 08001002 60 8 60 2 1 1 0 0 000001837aca0000 08041002 60 8 60 5 1 1 0 0 000001887bfd0000 08001002 60 20 60 1 2 1 0 0 000001830cf30000 08001002 3324 1364 3124 19 10 3 0 0 LFH 000001830ce30000 08001002 60 8 60 5 1 1 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
输出结果如上所示,NT堆内容好少....什么原因....好吧根据 maoni所说,似乎是验证出了问题。
GC没有管辖这些内存,所以说还是我们编写的代码有问题,我们返过来再考虑一个事情,“导出进行时,内存会大量增加,导出完成后内存会降低下去”。我们来看一下代码,如下所示,其实我们现在明白的是,在我们执行期间肯定是这些内存一直“持有”,并没有被释放掉。
app.MapGet("/excel", async content => { string path = Path.Combine(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory(), "test.xlsx"); List<TestDto> list = new(); for (int i = 0; i < 400; i++) { list.Add(new TestDto { ImageUrl = "https://gimg2.baidu.com/image_search/src=http%3A%2F%2Fup.enterdesk.com%2Fedpic_source%2F53%2F0a%2Fda%2F530adad966630fce548cd408237ff200.jpg&refer=http%3A%2F%2Fup.enterdesk.com&app=2002&size=f9999,10000&q=a80&n=0&g=0n&fmt=jpeg?sec=1641193100&t=417a589da8c9ba3103ed74c33fbd6c70" }); } Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew(); ExcelExporter exporter = new ExcelExporter(); await exporter.Export(path, list); stopwatch.Stop(); await content.Response.WriteAsync(stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalSeconds.ToString()); });
根据内存的表现和我们的理论,我们继续利用windbg来排查一下,现在其实我们可以发现,这些对象最终还是被GC收回了,带着理论我们继续构思,GC是知道哪些对象可以终结的对吧?并且它们在变成不可到达时调用它们的终结器,在GC中会利用finalization queue来记录这些终结对象。所以说我们是不是可以查一下?如下所示,我们来看一下。
0:000> !finalizequeue ---------------------------------- Statistics for all finalizable objects (including all objects ready for finalization): MT Count TotalSize Class Name 00007ffc2dc23818 1 24 System.Net.Security.SafeCredentialReference 00007ffc2dac4238 1 24 System.WeakReference 00007ffc2d6eb908 1 24 System.WeakReference`1[[Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.KestrelServerOptions, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core]] 00007ffc2d6e4120 1 24 System.WeakReference`1[[System.Runtime.Loader.AssemblyLoadContext, System.Private.CoreLib]] 00007ffc2d572b68 1 24 System.WeakReference`1[[Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.ServiceProvider, Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection]] 00007ffc2d429258 1 24 System.WeakReference`1[[System.IO.FileSystemWatcher, System.IO.FileSystem.Watcher]] 00007ffc2dd15c20 1 32 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeBCryptAlgorithmHandle 00007ffc2d6de4d8 1 32 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeLocalAllocHandle 00007ffc2d68fa00 1 32 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeCertStoreHandle 00007ffc2d3a5cc0 1 32 System.Net.Quic.Implementations.MsQuic.Internal.SafeMsQuicRegistrationHandle 00007ffc2db390c8 1 40 Interop+WinHttp+SafeWinHttpHandle 00007ffc2d69a420 1 40 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeCertContextHandle 00007ffc2d5bea18 1 40 System.Diagnostics.EventLog 00007ffc2dc29a38 1 48 System.Net.Security.SafeFreeCredential_SECURITY 00007ffc2d963f80 2 48 System.WeakReference`1[[System.Text.RegularExpressions.RegexReplacement, System.Text.RegularExpressions]] 00007ffc2d7a3750 2 48 System.WeakReference`1[[Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.Internal.Infrastructure.KestrelConnection, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core]] 00007ffc2d685e10 1 56 System.Runtime.CompilerServices.ConditionalWeakTable`2+Container[[System.Buffers.TlsOverPerCoreLockedStacksArrayPool`1+ThreadLocalArray[[System.Char, System.Private.CoreLib]][], System.Private.CoreLib],[System.Object, System.Private.CoreLib]] 00007ffc2d44c4d0 1 56 System.Runtime.CompilerServices.ConditionalWeakTable`2+Container[[System.Buffers.TlsOverPerCoreLockedStacksArrayPool`1+ThreadLocalArray[[System.Byte, System.Private.CoreLib]][], System.Private.CoreLib],[System.Object, System.Private.CoreLib]] 00007ffc2d96be68 1 64 CellStore`1[[System.Uri, System.Private.Uri]] 00007ffc2d96b780 1 64 FlagCellStore 00007ffc2d96af48 1 64 CellStore`1[[System.Object, System.Private.CoreLib]] 00007ffc2d96a5b8 1 64 CellStore`1[[OfficeOpenXml.ExcelCoreValue, Magicodes.IE.EPPlus]] 00007ffc2d6ddab8 2 64 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeChainEngineHandle 00007ffc2d69d528 2 64 Internal.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeRegistryHandle 00007ffc2d685bc8 2 64 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeWaitHandle 00007ffc2d685280 3 72 System.Threading.ThreadInt64PersistentCounter+ThreadLocalNodeFinalizationHelper 00007ffc2d5f5f50 3 72 System.Runtime.InteropServices.PosixSignalRegistration 00007ffc2d4299d0 1 72 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeFileHandle 00007ffc2d6e40b8 1 80 System.Runtime.Loader.DefaultAssemblyLoadContext 00007ffc2dac9ed0 2 96 PageIndex 00007ffc2d96d0c8 2 96 ColumnIndex 00007ffc2d464470 3 120 System.Gen2GcCallback 00007ffc2d40a620 1 120 System.IO.FileSystemWatcher 00007ffc2d96bc18 2 128 CellStore`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]] 00007ffc2dac20c8 2 144 System.Reflection.Emit.DynamicResolver 00007ffc2d680f10 3 144 System.Threading.LowLevelLock 00007ffc2d683c48 3 168 System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueueThreadLocals 00007ffc2d681e80 1 176 System.Threading.LowLevelLifoSemaphore 00007ffc2dc25ef0 1 184 System.Collections.Concurrent.CDSCollectionETWBCLProvider 00007ffc2db8e658 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 00007ffc2db8c378 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 00007ffc2db38f90 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 00007ffc2d90c658 1 184 Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStreamManager+Events 00007ffc2d689b48 1 184 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Certificates.Generation.CertificateManager+CertificateManagerEventSource 00007ffc2d66f9f8 1 184 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.FrameworkEventSource 00007ffc2d66b720 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 00007ffc2d44d128 1 184 System.Buffers.ArrayPoolEventSource 00007ffc2d2e2ec8 1 184 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.NativeRuntimeEventSource 00007ffc2d694e10 1 192 System.Threading.Tasks.TplEventSource 00007ffc2d572ab0 1 192 Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.DependencyInjectionEventSource 00007ffc2d505f00 1 200 Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.EventSource.LoggingEventSource 00007ffc2db8ade8 1 224 System.Net.NameResolutionTelemetry 00007ffc2d428b08 7 224 System.Threading.PreAllocatedOverlapped 00007ffc2d563c78 1 232 System.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSourceEventSource 00007ffc2d61fe88 1 240 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.HostingEventSource 00007ffc2db6b788 8 256 System.Threading.TimerQueue+AppDomainTimerSafeHandle 00007ffc2d690270 1 280 System.Net.Sockets.SocketsTelemetry 00007ffc2db6bc80 1 296 System.Net.Http.HttpTelemetry 00007ffc2d68b998 1 336 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.Internal.Infrastructure.KestrelEventSource 00007ffc2dc21998 1 360 System.Net.Security.NetSecurityTelemetry 00007ffc2d2dae28 1 384 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.RuntimeEventSource 00007ffc2d66ad60 10 480 System.Net.Sockets.SafeSocketHandle 00007ffc2d2e0240 21 504 System.WeakReference`1[[System.Diagnostics.Tracing.EventSource, System.Private.CoreLib]] 00007ffc2d2b0538 9 648 System.Threading.Thread 00007ffc2d77a188 2 704 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Transport.Sockets.Internal.SocketReceiver 00007ffc2d90cec0 6 960 Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream 00007ffc2d5fc658 10 1280 System.Net.Sockets.Socket 00007ffc2d68d898 4 1536 System.Net.Sockets.Socket+AwaitableSocketAsyncEventArgs 00007ffc2d2dc778 42 4704 System.Diagnostics.Tracing.EventSource+OverrideEventProvider 00007ffc2daec058 356 14240 System.Drawing.Bitmap Total 553 objects
WOW!!!,看上面356个System.Drawing.Bitmap
在等待回收,看起来这是我们的影响因素,我们来查一下代码。
try { cell.Value = string.Empty; Bitmap bitmap; if (url.IsBase64StringValid()) { bitmap = url.Base64StringToBitmap(); } else { bitmap = Extension.GetBitmapByUrl(url); } if (bitmap == null) { cell.Value = ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Alt; } else { ExcelPicture pic = CurrentExcelWorksheet.Drawings.AddPicture(Guid.NewGuid().ToString(), bitmap); AddImage((rowIndex + (ExcelExporterSettings.HeaderRowIndex > 1 ? ExcelExporterSettings.HeaderRowIndex : 0)), colIndex - ignoreCount, pic, ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.YOffset, ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.XOffset); CurrentExcelWorksheet.Row(rowIndex + 1).Height = ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Height; pic.SetSize(ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Width * 7, ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Height); } } catch (Exception) { cell.Value = ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Alt; }
在ExcelPicture对象中去使用Bitmap对象,对于在线图片源来说,我们会读取并存储到Bitmap中,但是我们发现并没有对该对象进行释放操作,所以导致大量的Bitmap一直没有释放,我们通过using来处理一下。
using (ExcelPicture pic = CurrentExcelWorksheet.Drawings.AddPicture(Guid.NewGuid().ToString(), bitmap)) { AddImage((rowIndex + (ExcelExporterSettings.HeaderRowIndex > 1 ? ExcelExporterSettings.HeaderRowIndex : 0)), colIndex - ignoreCount, pic, ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.YOffset, ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.XOffset); CurrentExcelWorksheet.Row(rowIndex + 1).Height = ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Height; pic.SetSize(ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Width * 7, ExporterHeaderList[colIndex].ExportImageFieldAttribute.Height); }
一个带有终结器的新对象是必须要被添加进finalization queue中的,这个行为也被称为“终结注册(registering for finalization)”。
当然我也建议你选择使用SOSEX扩展插件,它提供了finalization类似的内容,似乎看起来更直观一些,如下所示。
下载地址:http://www.stevestechspot.com/default.aspx
:000> .load D:sosex_64sosex.dll This dump has no SOSEX heap index. The heap index makes searching for references and roots much faster. To create a heap index, run !bhi 0:000> !finq -stat Generation 0: Count Total Size Type --------------------------------------------------------- 54 2160 System.Drawing.Bitmap 54 objects, 2,160 bytes Generation 1: Count Total Size Type --------------------------------------------------------- 1 184 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Certificates.Generation.CertificateManager+CertificateManagerEventSource 1 336 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.Internal.Infrastructure.KestrelEventSource 4 1536 System.Net.Sockets.Socket+AwaitableSocketAsyncEventArgs 1 32 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeCertStoreHandle 1 280 System.Net.Sockets.SocketsTelemetry 1 192 System.Threading.Tasks.TplEventSource 1 40 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeCertContextHandle 2 64 Internal.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeRegistryHandle 2 64 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeChainEngineHandle 1 32 Internal.Cryptography.Pal.Native.SafeLocalAllocHandle 1 80 System.Runtime.Loader.DefaultAssemblyLoadContext 1 24 System.WeakReference`1[[System.Runtime.Loader.AssemblyLoadContext, System.Private.CoreLib]] 1 24 System.WeakReference`1[[Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.KestrelServerOptions, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core]] 2 704 Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Transport.Sockets.Internal.SocketReceiver 2 48 System.WeakReference`1[[Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.Internal.Infrastructure.KestrelConnection, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core]] 1 184 Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStreamManager+Events 6 960 Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream 2 48 System.WeakReference`1[[System.Text.RegularExpressions.RegexReplacement, System.Text.RegularExpressions]] 1 64 CellStore`1[[OfficeOpenXml.ExcelCoreValue, Magicodes.IE.EPPlus]] 1 64 CellStore`1[[System.Object, System.Private.CoreLib]] 1 64 FlagCellStore 2 128 CellStore`1[[System.Int32, System.Private.CoreLib]] 1 64 CellStore`1[[System.Uri, System.Private.Uri]] 2 96 ColumnIndex 2 144 System.Reflection.Emit.DynamicResolver 1 24 System.WeakReference 2 96 PageIndex 302 12080 System.Drawing.Bitmap 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 1 40 Interop+WinHttp+SafeWinHttpHandle 8 256 System.Threading.TimerQueue+AppDomainTimerSafeHandle 1 296 System.Net.Http.HttpTelemetry 1 224 System.Net.NameResolutionTelemetry 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 1 184 System.Net.NetEventSource 1 360 System.Net.Security.NetSecurityTelemetry 1 24 System.Net.Security.SafeCredentialReference 1 184 System.Collections.Concurrent.CDSCollectionETWBCLProvider 1 48 System.Net.Security.SafeFreeCredential_SECURITY 1 32 Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeBCryptAlgorithmHandle 499 objects, 30,736 bytes Generation 2: 0 objects, 0 bytes TOTAL: 553 objects, 32,896 bytes
可能大家都会像我一开始有个疑问,你这个图片我看了...没有那么大,并且在windbg中也没有表现大小呀。首先我们先来看一下这个图片的质量。
图片的像素为2560x1440,位深为24目前已知这些信息,我们计算一下未压缩的图片大小。
2560x1440x24/8
10M左右一张图,已知图片数x10M=3G,其实对于这个问题来说,这并不属于内存泄漏。